[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.145.213.148. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Medical News & Perspectives
February 9, 2000

IRBs Search for Answers and Support During a Time of Institutional Change

Author Affiliations
 

Not Available

Not Available

JAMA. 2000;283(6):729-730. doi:10.1001/jama.283.6.729

Boston—The last year and a half was an embarrassing and humbling period for institutional review boards (IRBs).

First came reports and recommendations by the President's National Bioethics Advisory Commission, the General Accounting Office, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of the Inspector General, all of which were critical of the current IRB system's ability to deal effectively with increasing workloads and changes in the way research is conducted and of its ability to adequately protect human subjects participating in research.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×