[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.52.237. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
August 16, 2000

Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Decision Making in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (Drs Ohman, Granger, and Harrington) and Department of Community and Family Medicine (Dr Lee), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

JAMA. 2000;284(7):876-878. doi:10.1001/jama.284.7.876

Management of acute coronary syndromes has advanced considerably during recent years, similar to the evolution in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in the 1980s. Then, fibrinolytic and aspirin therapy were shown to reduce mortality substantially.1 Although these therapies first were applied to all patients with suspected MI,1 those with ST-segment elevation or left bundle-branch block were shown to derive most, if not all, of the benefit.2 Accelerated tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) then was found to be superior to streptokinase in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial, with a relative 14% reduction in 30-day mortality.3 Mortality models suggested that tPA treatment independently predicted better outcomes, consistent across patient subgroups regardless of absolute risk.4 Without a heterogeneous treatment effect, the interpretation was that almost all patients with MI would benefit from tPA treatment.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×