[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.191.72. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
November 8, 2000

The Continuing Quest for Measuring and Improving Access to Necessary Care

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Rensselaer, NY.

JAMA. 2000;284(18):2374-2376. doi:10.1001/jama.284.18.2374

A decade ago, the Institute of Medicine defined quality of care as ". . . the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge."1 This definition is complex and comprehensive, and its many facets are described in detail in an article by Chassin et al2 based on the consensus of the Institute of Medicine's National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. For instance, for "health services for individuals and populations to increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes" they must be used both appropriately and effectively. Quality-of-care problems related to undesirable health outcomes can arise as a result of underuse, overuse, or misuse.2

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×