[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 370
Citations 0
Comment & Response
November 19, 2014

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies and Health Care–Associated Infection—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA. 2014;312(19):2042-2043. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.12319

In Reply The clarification regarding comparative groups from Dr Gregersen and colleagues is appreciated. In their abstract,1 the HR was reported as 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-1.14) and these figures were used in our meta-analysis. This was predicated on the assumption, based on conventional terminology, that the newer therapy (restrictive strategy) was placed in the numerator and the traditional or control therapy (liberal strategy) was placed in the denominator. This was an incorrect assumption.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×