[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Books, Journals, New Media
August 1, 2001

DebriefingPsychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence

Author Affiliations
 

Harriet S.MeyerMD, Contributing EditorDavid H.MorseMS, Journal Review EditorRobertHoganMD, adviser for new media

 

Not Available

 

edited by Beverley Raphael and John P. Wilson, 376 pp, with illus, paper, $59.95, ISBN 0-521-64700-2, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2000.

JAMA. 2001;286(5):604-605. doi:10.1001/jama.286.5.604

Psychological debriefing is widely used for trauma survivors and has been suggested to have positive and potentially preventive benefits, including diminished occurrence of future morbidity. In addition there is a pervasive belief, often promoted by commercial interests, that providing debriefing after traumatic incidents will prevent the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Indeed, this belief is so common and entrenched in the health care community that organizations that do not offer debriefing for workers exposed to on-the-job trauma may put themselves in medical-legal jeopardy. While these beliefs have remained uncontested for years, recently a growing countervailing view has emerged so that currently advocates and antagonists dispute the role of debriefing in PTSD prevention and treatment. Meanwhile, a burgeoning industry of professional counselors applies debriefing, sometimes indiscriminately, to witnesses and survivors of traumatic events.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×