[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Books, Journals, New Media
February 20, 2002

Peer ReviewEditorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses

Author Affiliations

Harriet S.MeyerMD, Contributing EditorDavid H.MorseMS, Journal Review EditorRobertHoganMD, adviser for new media


Not Available

JAMA. 2002;287(7):915-916. doi:10.1001/jama.287.7.915

Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses presents a comprehensive examination of the process of editorial review during the second half of the 20th century. A respected health science librarian, Ann Weller has conducted a thorough review of nearly 1500 English-language studies on editorial peer review that were published between 1945 and 1997. Weller's strategy to identify these studies included search of the standard scientific online databases as well as a self-described Sherlock Holmes-like detection of additional relevant studies cited in articles identified in the online databases. She also developed a database of 300 irrelevant articles. Studies included in this monograph come from a variety of disciplines, including medicine, nursing, psychology, business, economics, library science, and sociology.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview