[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.75.176. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
February 12, 2003

Consequences of Selling a Kidney in IndiaConsequences of Selling a Kidney in India

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2003;289(6):697. doi:10.1001/jama.289.6.697-a

To the Editor: Dr Goyal and colleagues1 report a deterioration in health status in a surprising 86% of Indian kidney sellers after nephrectomy. This is not the experience of living kidney donors in the United States, and these poor outcomes may not necessarily be relevant to the debate about paid donation in western countries.

In his Commentary, Dr Rothman2 recognizes that people in financial need—not all of them "desperately poor"— may do things for money that others might avoid. People such as professional football players also take risks to their health for money. Participating in or otherwise supporting these practices is not necessarily unethical. Rothman also notes that kidney selling may not produce sustained financial benefit for sellers. However, living kidney donation in the United States has never produced permanently good results either. Even now, 1 in 20 recipients returns to dialysis within a year; about 25% need dialysis within 7 to 8 years.3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×