[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
August 13, 2003

Universal Health Insurance—Let the Debate Resume

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliation: Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

JAMA. 2003;290(6):818-820. doi:10.1001/jama.290.6.818

The article by The Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance1 in this issue of THE JOURNAL should re-energize the much needed debate on universal health insurance. More than 40 million Americans lack health insurance2 and nearly 60 million are without health insurance for a portion of the year.3 Employers face rising health insurance premiums, and their employees face increasing cost-sharing. There are ongoing and increasing disagreements about health benefits coverage. Physicians, hospital administrators, home health agency financial officers, and others are increasingly frustrated with the confusion and inefficiencies of the current multiple payment mechanisms. In these fiscally troubled times, state legislators are having difficulty finding funds to support Medicaid and free-care pools. Clearly, there must be a "simpler and better way."

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×