[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.129.96. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 3, 2003

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2003;290(9):1149. doi:10.1001/jama.290.9.1149-a

To the Editor: In his Commentary on the influence of the drug industry on continuing medical education (CME), Dr Relman1 argued that industry-sponsored medical education and communication companies (MECCs) exist solely for commercial purposes.

We disagree, and find nothing in his commentary to support that conclusion. To quote Relman, we believe that "in the absence of evidence to support that assumption, it is an insult to our nation's leading medical professionals" and to the professionals employed by MECCs to dismiss the value of MECC-produced CME on the basis of innuendo.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×