[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 24, 2003

Ethical Aspects in Trials of Implantable Medical Devices

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2003;290(12):1579. doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1579-a

To the Editor: Dr Connolly and colleagues1 found that pacemaker therapy did not reduce the risk of recurrent syncope in patients with vasovagal syncope. Patients in the control group all underwent pacemaker implantation, but their pacemakers were set for sensing only, without pacing in the event of a dysrhythmia. The authors justified this nontherapeutic surgical intervention by noting that control patients could have their devices activated for pacing once the study had been completed. Although there is controversy about the ethical aspects of such sham surgery,2,3 this study is unique in that the patients were left with an implanted device.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×