[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
JAMA 100 Years Ago
January 7, 2004


Author Affiliations

JAMA 100 Years Ago Section Editor: Jennifer Reiling, Assistant Editor.

JAMA. 2004;291(1):132. doi:10.1001/jama.291.1.132-a

From time to time announcements are made to the effect that the cause of scarlet fever has been discovered, but so far none of these assertions has received general acceptance. Even the assertion that scarlet fever is a streptococcus disease has not proved itself successful, in spite of the almost constant association of local and general streptococcus infections at least in severe cases of scarlet fever, principally because the streptococci isolated from cases of scarlet fever do not differ from the ordinary streptococci, and because of the further fact that while one attack of scarlet fever, be it ever so mild, confers a permanent immunity to subsequent attacks; this unfortunately does not hold true in regard to the various forms of streptococcus infection with which we are familiar.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview