[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.119.171. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
January 21, 2004

Traditional Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2004;291(3):299. doi:10.1001/jama.291.3.299-c

To the Editor: Although the study by Dr Greenland and colleagues1 documented the high frequency of at least 1 of the 4 major risk factors among patients with CHD, their data provide no clear measure of the power of this risk profile to predict high risk of CHD events.

Using data from the authors' Table 1, I used likelihood ratio (LR) analysis25 to compute the predictive power of having at least 1 risk factor. The sensitivity, specificity, and complement of specificity (100 − specificity) were derived for the combined data of the 3 studies that Greenland et al described. The likelihood ratio for an event (ie, a positive LR) in odds:1 units is a prevalence-independent measure calculated as the sensitivity divided by (100 − specificity). An LR of 2.0 or less denotes low predictive power and an LR of 9.0 or more denotes high predictive power. Table 1 shows the composite measures for the 3 studies of the predictive power for CHD death, or for CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, in men and women ages 18 to 59 years, as determined by the presence of 1 or more risk factors

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×