[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
April 28, 2004

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956. doi:10.1001/jama.291.16.1957-a

To the Editor: Given the low frequency of SSIs in the study of Dr Pryor and colleagues,1 we are concerned that their sample size was too small to obtain reliable results. The authors stated that 300 patients provided an 80% power to rule out a 40% difference between the treatment groups (the specified null hypothesis) at an α of .05. Using an 11% infection rate in patients given 35% oxygen, as reported by Greif et al2 and observed by Pryor et al, we compute that an 80% power to detect a 40% reduction in the infection rate from 11% to 6.6% would require 651 patients; 930 patients would be required to detect a 40% increase from 11% to 15.4%. The study thus appears to have been underpowered from the start—and then was stopped after only 160 patients were randomized. For a study anticipated to have 300 patients, 160 patients (53.3%) is a curious a priori stopping point.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×