[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
May 5, 2004

Physicians as Citizens

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2004;291(17):2075-2076. doi:10.1001/jama.291.17.2075-b

To the Editor: In their Special Communication about physician-citizens, Dr Gruen and colleagues1 proposed that public obligations of physicians should be proportional to 3 criteria: the degree to which proposed actions directly address disease causation, their feasibility to perform, and their efficaciousness. Critical among the factors is the relation of the action to disease causation. Hence, in the authors' view, actions targeting broad socioeconomic conditions that indirectly influence health care are "aspirational goals," but not obligatory. Although the authors provided examples for distinguishing direct and indirect causes of disease, they did not establish specific guidelines. For instance, the authors stated that actions addressing cigarette smoking and needle exchange are direct and obligatory. By contrast, actions to address income disparities or to remove environmental pollutants are indirect, and thus aspirational.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×