[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.142.219. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
September 15, 2004

Trial RegistrationA Great Idea Switches From Ignored to Irresistible

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliation: Dr Rennie is Deputy Editor, JAMA.

JAMA. 2004;292(11):1359-1362. doi:10.1001/jama.292.11.1359

In a recent article in JAMA on the registration of clinical trials,1 Dickersin and I pointed out that, 30 years after the idea of registering trials had been proposed, 18 years after registration of trials at inception had been shown to eliminate publication bias, and despite the presence of numerous trial registers large and small, Manheimer and Anderson2 were correct in stating that "No comprehensive system for tracking, organizing, and disseminating information about ongoing clinical trials currently exists." We described a profound confusion about even the most basic data from, or existence of, clinical trials. Only half of the million or so trials conducted over the past 56 years are likely to have been reported,1 and of those reported, a substantial proportion did not appear in MEDLINE.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×