[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.216.242. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
January 19, 2005

Regionalization of Coronary Angioplasty and Travel Distance

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2005;293(3):295-296. doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.295-b

To the Editor: Ms Kansagra and colleagues1 concluded that regionalization policies for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty would not affect patient travel distances. Although the study and results are compelling, additional analyses may provide further insight and possibly different findings. Results from New Jersey, New York, and Florida may not be applicable to other states with lower physician and population densities. Also, the overall results may not reflect variation among different regions (eg, Western New York, Florida panhandle) and counties within the 3 states.Regionalization could have significantly different effects on rural, suburban, and urban areas that have varying access to physicians and hospitals. For example, Losina et al2 found that policies restricting total hip replacements to high-volume centers would differentially affect poor, less-educated, and rural patients. Stratifying the analysis by population density, socioeconomic indicators, types of insurance carriers, and health care professional and facility density may be very valuable.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×