[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
March 9, 2005

Low–Glycemic Load Diet and Resting Energy Expenditure

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2005;293(10):1189-1190. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1189-a

To the Editor: The study by Dr Pereira and colleagues1 showed a smaller reduction in resting energy expenditure during a low–glycemic load diet compared with a low-fat diet in a group of patients who were obese. Although the results of the study seem to favor the use of the low–glycemic load diet, the selection criteria may have introduced a selection bias so that the patients were representative of no more than 20% of the obese population. We base this on the following 3 considerations. First, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome may be up to 70% in obese women.2,3 In this study, 3 of 4 patients were women, yet metabolic syndrome was not present. Second, although a minority of people who are obese may be free of insulin resistance, it appears that this study population did not have insulin resistance. Third, the absence of the metabolic syndrome and the normality of insulin sensitivity could help explain the relatively low levels of C-reactive protein which has been found to be positively associated with the prevalence of both obesity and the metabolic syndrome.4,5 We are interested in knowing the waist size and the body mass index (BMI) in this population. We believe that the poor representativeness of the study sample with respect to the entire obese population represents a major limitation to generalizing these findings.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×