[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
September 21, 2005

Consensus and Controversy in Clinical Research Ethics

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

JAMA. 2005;294(11):1411-1414. doi:10.1001/jama.294.11.1411

An international consensus for protecting the rights and interests of research subjects has emerged in a process that began with the Declaration of Helsinki1 and continues in the development of official guidelines2 as well as a growing scholarly literature.3 Despite this consensus, legitimate ethical controversies persist. This article discusses points of consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics, focusing on substantive, rather than procedural, concerns.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×