[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
October 5, 2005

Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2005;294(13):1616-1618. doi:10.1001/jama.294.13.1616

To the Editor: We would like to raise some points regarding the report of the STRATEGY trial by Dr Valgimigli and colleagues.1 The study compared adjuvant tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stenting vs abciximab plus bare-metal stenting in the context of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and found no significant differences in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days. However, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization were significantly less frequent in the tirofiban plus sirolimus-eluting stent group at 8 months, a finding that also drove the reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events for that group. The strategy of using different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in the 2 groups was based on the higher cost implications of abciximab (compared with tirofiban) and drug-eluting stents.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×