[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
April 26, 2006

Pacemaker and ICD Malfunction—An Incomplete Picture

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliation: Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

JAMA. 2006;295(16):1944-1946. doi:10.1001/jama.295.16.1944

In this issue of JAMA, the reports by Maisel and colleagues1,2 and by Gould and Krahn3 represent substantial pieces of an information mosaic that is developing about life-sustaining and life-saving implantable arrhythmia device technologies. It is apparent, not only to the medical community, but also to patients, the press, regulators, investors, and the legal community, that this information mosaic is complex. The technologies are complex. The medical issues are complex. The ethical issues are complex. The financial issues are complex. No effort should trivialize this complexity or oversimplify and produce “the solution” without understanding that the information comes with gaps and never forms more than an incomplete mosaic. These 3 studies13 provide new data to inform the most important issue—how physicians and patients should make individual decisions regarding pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) surgery.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×