[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
September 20, 2006

Federal Health Policy Response to Hurricane KatrinaWhat It Was and What It Could Have Been

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Center for American Progress, Washington, DC (Dr Lambrew); and University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fla (Dr Shalala).

JAMA. 2006;296(11):1394-1397. doi:10.1001/jama.296.11.1394

One year ago, the United States experienced one of the worst natural disasters in its history. Hurricane Katrina caused well-documented, widespread death and destruction, reducing hospital capacity by 80% and safety-net clinics by 75% in New Orleans alone.1 The hurricane also created a diaspora of more than a million evacuees to every state in the nation.

This disaster could be viewed as an isolated event. Indeed, the hurricane destroyed infrastructure in states with low income and particularly high health care needs. Yet similar crises could occur in different and, unfortunately, likely circumstances. A major earthquake, avian flu epidemic, or bioterrorism attack could diminish health care capacity, cause displacement, and take a great toll on the nation's health. Thus, the federal health policy response to Hurricane Katrina is not just history but a test of the system's effectiveness.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×