[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
October 4, 2006

Shift Shown in Influenza A Adamantane Resistance—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2006;296(13):1585-1587. doi:10.1001/jama.296.13.1586

In Reply: We agree with Dr Shea and Dr Shah that explanations for the rapid increase in resistance to the adamantane-class antivirals among influenza A viruses should be investigated. A single point mutation in the transmembrane region of the M2 gene can confer resistance to amantadine and rimantadine.1 Such an event may occur spontaneously or as a result of selective pressure from treatment with these drugs; we cannot determine the exact mechanism underlying the rapid increase in resistance among US isolates. Influenza A viruses isolated from several continents during recent influenza seasons contain the serine-to-asparagine change at amino acid 31 of the M2 protein that conferred adamantane resistance among A(H3N2) viruses isolated during the 2005-2006 North American influenza season; this antigenic variant was first isolated in East Asia during the 2004-2005 season, and its subsequent spread led the World Health Organization to recommend that A/Wisconsin/67/2005 be used as the H3N2 component of the Northern Hemisphere 2006-2007 influenza vaccines.2 It is unlikely that US patterns of antiviral use led to adamantane resistance; it is more likely that resistance emerged in East Asia in association with a specific influenza A(H3N2) antigenic variant that had a selective advantage, allowing it to spread widely.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×