[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
March 28, 2007

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Thrombolysis for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author Affiliations

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2007;297(12):1313-1315. doi:10.1001/jama.297.12.1313-a

To the Editor: In their study of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs thrombolysis, Dr Stenestrand and colleagues1 reported long-term outcomes among patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Sweden between 1999 and 2004.1 They documented divergent outcomes stratified by initial reperfusion strategy. We would like to offer a different interpretation of the data.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview