[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 27, 1924

ELECTRICITY IN DERMATOLOGY

Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

JAMA. 1924;83(13):971-974. doi:10.1001/jama.1924.02660130011004
Abstract

The percentage of dermatologic cases in which electricity is used naturally varies with the individual practitioner. One resorts to roentgen rays for acne, while another relies on keratolytics and vaccines; one prefers carbon dioxid snow or trichloracetic acid for certain benign new growths which another treats more confidently with the electric needle or the galvanocautery. The experience of a single observer is, therefore, not conclusive.

While my own records show that 47 per cent, of all office patients receive electrical treatment in some form, it is not claimed that they furnish an index of the ideal. It is not to be expected that there will be constant agreement as to the choice of the electrical agent for a given case, in which any one of several accomplishes the same result, and in which an equivalent effect is possible without recourse to electricity at all.

The principal forms of electricity used

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×