[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 20, 1923

LONDON

JAMA. 1923;80(3):195-196. doi:10.1001/jama.1923.02640300045022

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Surgeon Sued for Operating Without Patient's Consent  Owing to the great interest and importance of the case referred to briefly in The Journal, Dec. 30, 1922, p. 2243, a more complete account, taken from the South African Medical Record, which has just come to hand, may well be given: In the Cape Provincial Division of the Supreme Court before Justice Watermeyer and a jury, a suit for damages in the amount of $50,000 was entered against Dr. C. C. Elliott, a Capetown surgeon, for amputation of the penis without the consent of the patient or, alternatively, for performing an unnecessary operation. The plaintiff, aged 50, was admitted to the New Somerset Hospital, Capetown, suffering from gangrenous ulcer of the penis. After a careful examination by the defendant, who is visiting surgeon to the hospital, and by Prof. G. B. Bartlett of the University of Capetown, who is pathologist to the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×