[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.142.219. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 416
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 7, 2015

Discordant Interpretations of Breast Biopsy Specimens by Pathologists

Author Affiliations
  • 1Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
JAMA. 2015;314(1):82-83. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6224

To the Editor I was one of the pathologists who participated in the study by Dr Elmore and colleagues.1 Although the conclusions are appropriately measured based on the inherent constraints imposed by the design, I have significant misgivings about the validity of the study based on my personal experience.

My participation was contingent on the promise of receiving relevant feedback to improve my practice. The recruitment material stated the purpose of the study was to “identify ways in which we can improve breast cancer diagnosis.” A single slide is certainly not the way I or most other pathologists practice. The investigators stated that there would be scheduled slides to review on a regular basis.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×