July 28, 2015

King v BurwellSubsidizing US Health Insurance for Low- and Middle-Income Individuals

Author Affiliations
  • 1Georgetown University Law Center, O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DC
  • 2O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DC

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA. 2015;314(4):333-334. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8673

On June 25, 2015, the US Supreme Court once again saved the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) by acting to prevent a “calamitous result that Congress plainly meant to avoid.”1 In King v Burwell, the Court upheld subsidies (tax credits) for purchasing health insurance in federal exchanges, preserving financial assistance for 6.4 million low- and middle-income individuals. An adverse ruling would have placed affordable health insurance out of reach for millions more by disrupting the ACA’s interlocking reforms and destabilizing insurance markets.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview