[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 20, 1926

"FALLACIES OF THE 'YEAST METHOD' OF DETECTING GLUCOSE IN THE URINE"

Author Affiliations

New Orleans

JAMA. 1926;86(12):892. doi:10.1001/jama.1926.02670380082036

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —The ordinary yeast method may tell us that the urine contains a fermentable substance; the new mycologic method tells us this and in addition tells us what the fermentable substance [ill] Dr. Einhorn states that the type of sugar present is of secondary importance. With this statement I am unable to agree. It seems to me that also from a practical point of view it is of importance to differentiate between glucose, maltose, galactose, lactose and pentose, and a method that enables us to do this in a fairly easy and rapid manner is perhaps of some utility.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×