[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.66.254. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 19, 1933

USE OF A STANDARD CLASSIFIED NOMENCLATURE OF DISEASE

Author Affiliations

Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston.

JAMA. 1933;101(8):621-622. doi:10.1001/jama.1933.02740330053028

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —Recently there has been published a new classified nomenclature of disease. This was prepared under the supervision of physicians representing practically all the national medical organizations of the United States, and so is both authoritative and generally acceptable. It is the last word in nomenclature. But why, it may be said, is there a need for a classified nomenclature of disease? What use is it?Without some such book of nomenclature, a patient's disease may be recorded as one of several diagnoses. This brings confusion when an attempt is made to gather together from a personal or a hospital file a group of cases of the same disease, for one does not know where to look for all of them among the index cards. One member of the staff uses a given diagnosis, another a different one. The same patient returning for several admissions, always having the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×