[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.167.137. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 26, 1927

CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF BILIARY AND RENAL CALCULUS SHADOWS

Author Affiliations

Chicago
From the Urologic and Roentgenologic Services of the Michael Reese Hospital.

JAMA. 1927;88(9):646. doi:10.1001/jama.1927.92680350028011c

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

At times the question arises as to whether a given shadow is that of a calculus in the gallbladder or kidney. Such a problem presented itself in a recent case in which a shadow in the right renal area appeared on the plain roentgenographic film. We deemed it advisable to study the relation of this shadow (A) to a cholecystogram.

In the ordinary anteroposterior exposure (B) the suspected renal calculus shadow is entirely included in that of the gallbladder. In another exposure (C) taken at a slightly different angle the shadow projects a little mesially to that of the cholecystogram, thus revealing the fact that the calculus is not in the gallbladder. In a third (D) lateral view the separation of the shadow of the calculus from that of the gallbladder is most marked. We believe that this method will be of great value in cases in which pyelography

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×