[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 535
Citations 0
The Art of JAMA
February 23, 2016

Spine PatchWarrington Colescott

JAMA. 2016;315(8):732-733. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.14125

Since its inception, printmaking has always lent itself to controversial topics. Easily reproduced and distributed among the masses, prints could circulate ideas about reform and revolution, often by means of caricature or satire. The writings of Martin Luther, Goya’s Caprichios, the social commentaries of William Hogarth and Thomas Rowlandson, and the political critiques of Honoré Daumier all relied on print technology to communicate more insightful messages about contemporary issues. In the post-war United States, these characteristics were joined by a prevailing theory that the physical process of printmaking could impart an emotion as well as a message. Warrington Colescott (1921-   ) was a proponent of this dual point of view, once writing that, “Etching quickens the blood, lights up the eye, affects the satiric mind in the same way that a low-cut neckline affects Dracula.”

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×