[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 388
Citations 0
Comment & Response
March 1, 2016

Hip Fracture Surgery vs Elective Total Hip Replacement

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Institute of Translational Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 3Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
JAMA. 2016;315(9):941-942. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.17852

To the Editor In an observational study, Dr Le Manach and colleagues1 used a 1:1 matching technique and found that the relative risk of in-hospital mortality was higher for patients with hip fracture than those undergoing elective total hip replacement. The authors concluded that this difference could not be adequately explained by patient characteristics and may represent “physiologic mechanisms, such as acute stress and inflammatory states resulting from the fractures.”1 However, this conclusion is difficult to justify given the large differences between the elective and trauma populations. Patients undergoing elective total hip replacement are selected for their suitability to undergo a major operation, whereas hip fractures are typically a consequence of physiological deterioration (osteoporosis and falling).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×