[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.140.252. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 19, 1941

EXTRARECTAL MASSES CAUSED BY TUMORS OF THE RECTO-UTERINE OR RECTOVESICAL SPACE

Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.
From the Section on Proctology of the Mayo Clinic.

JAMA. 1941;117(3):167-169. doi:10.1001/jama.1941.02820290009003
Abstract

An extrarectal mass in the recto-uterine or rectovesical space is encountered frequently in the course of routine digital examination of the rectum. The significance of the mass seldom is recognized, and it is sometimes confused with primary carcinoma of the rectum. Because of the prognostic and diagnostic importance of extrarectal tumors, digital and proctoscopic examination should not be omitted in cases of obscure abdominal disease.

In 1895, Strauss,1 discussing some cases of operative carcinoma of the stomach, stated: "Carcinomatous metastases in the liver were found at operation in this case, also in the retroperitoneal tissue, and in Douglas' pouch. The latter situation we have found repeatedly as a site of metastases in carcinoma of the stomach and which on account of its accessibility to digital exploration merits more frequent attention during examination." This is the first mention that we have found in the literature of malignant growths in the pelvis secondary to primary gastric carcinoma; the importance of these growths was overlooked for fourteen years, until Blumer's 2 description in 1909. Since then "Blumer's shelf" has been mentioned frequently (figs. 1, 2 and 3). According to Blumer's original article, the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×