Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
To the Editor Dr Schultz and colleagues1 studied laparoscopic lavage vs colon resection for perforated diverticulitis. They reported no differences in severe postoperative complications, and 20% of patients needed further surgery after a laparoscopic lavage vs 6% after resection.
Should reoperation after a laparoscopic lavage be considered a complication? If having to perform a Hartmann procedure later in the patient’s treatment was considered a complication for the lavage group, then should not all primary Hartmann procedures have been considered complications as well? A Hartmann procedure is a morbid surgery requiring a large laparotomy. This procedure has long-term risks of incisional hernia, small-bowel obstruction, and colostomy (which will require a second major laparotomy for restoration of intestinal continuity). In the resection group, 70% of patients had this procedure up front.
Roberts J. Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis. JAMA. 2016;315(10):1052-1053. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.17867