[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.241.199. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
April 19, 2016

Managing the Risks of Concurrent Surgeries

Author Affiliations
  • 1Stanford Law School and Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
  • 2Deputy Editor, JAMA
  • 3Department of Surgery at the UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas
  • 4Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA. 2016;315(15):1563-1564. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2305

Tony Meng was 41 years old when a complex spinal operation left him paralyzed. Although paralysis is a known complication of such operations, he sued the surgeon.1 Only during the litigation did he learn that his surgeon had operated on 2 patients concurrently. It is not clear that the overlapping scheduling contributed to the outcome, but the media attention the case received has sparked discussion about the appropriateness of concurrent surgeries.2

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×