[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 30, 1934


Author Affiliations

New Orleans

JAMA. 1934;102(26):2180. doi:10.1001/jama.1934.62750260003009b

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The construction of the eye dropper is such that the contained fluid comes in contact with its rubber bulb or cap, and this not alone at a time following a change in its position from the vertical to the horizontal but also when the rubber bulb has a greater pull than is necessary to fill merely a part of the glass tubing, and, as a result of this, the contents act on the rubber bulb and produce a change that becomes a source of danger when dropped onto or into sensitive parts of the body. An applicable example is the danger at the time of a cataract extraction when an open wound is exposed to these products of rubber dissolution.

This danger is so obviously true concerning the harm that can come from the disintegrated rubber in an open wound that it was thought proper to devise an eye dropper

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview