[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 346
Citations 0
Comment & Response
April 26, 2016

Conflict or Confluence of Interest?—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
  • 2Associate Editor, JAMA
JAMA. 2016;315(16):1793-1794. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0327

In Reply Dr Shaw and colleagues think that the term “conflict of interest” is not pejorative because the implication is that this infers the potential for conflict rather than its reality. We do not think so. A conflict is a clash, a quarrel, a squabble, or a disagreement, often of a protracted nature, not just the prospect of its occurrence. Journals require increasingly “full and transparent reporting,” for example, by provision of metadata, but do not request authors to address a priori their “fabrication of results” unless they detect evidence that this has occurred.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×