[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 372
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 17, 2016

Firearm Access and Risk of Suicide—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
  • 2Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville
  • 3Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
JAMA. 2016;315(19):2124-2125. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1071

In Reply Mr Kels highlights a confusing aspect of federal and state laws that disqualify certain people from accessing firearms. What types of involuntary mental health interventions result in a gun-prohibiting record that is reportable to the NICS? The question is difficult to answer because commitment practices vary substantially by state and locality.

Under federal law, individuals lose their firearm rights if they have been “committed to a mental institution.” In many states, commitment proceedings have 2 stages. The initial stage is a short period (eg, 3-5 days) of hospitalization for the purposes of providing emergency treatment and evaluation of whether patients meet commitment criteria; the second stage is a formal commitment hearing. These admissions are often authorized by an emergency medicine physician or mental health professional and in some states are ratified ex parte by a magistrate. These patients are discharged quite often before a formal hearing is required, so hospitalization never results in a commitment order.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×