[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.98.119. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 833
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 24/31, 2016

Risk of Anaphylaxis With Intravenous Iron Products

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
  • 2ACUMEN LLC, Burlingame, California
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2232-2233. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0965

In Reply In response to Dr DeLoughery’s concern about diphenhydramine, provided is a sensitivity analysis that excluded all anaphylaxis cases with the claim of “injection of diphenhydramine” (Table 1). Results are consistent with the primary analysis.

Regarding incidence rates, as discussed in our article, rates from our study were substantially lower than those reported from clinical trials of intravenous iron products. Although other study populations might have contributed to the observed differences, other differences in identifying and reporting anaphylaxis cases during clinical trials and during general clinical practice might also be relevant. Practicing physicians might not classify less severe or atypical anaphylactic cases as anaphylaxis; thus, the sensitivity of the anaphylaxis algorithm used in our study was probably low. We do not recommend comparing the crude incidence rates of anaphylaxis from this study with rates of other medications, especially if the latter estimates were based on different data sources or study methods.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×