[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 372
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May NaN, 2016

Intended vs Reported Scope of Practice—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Santa Rosa Family Medicine Residency, Santa Rosa, California
  • 2American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2234-2235. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1727

In Reply Dr Sugihara inquires how malpractice liability may be driving our findings. Malpractice liability costs vary widely,1 and the American Board of Family Medicine examination registration questionnaire did not include questions about malpractice insurance or the reasons why a specific type of care was or was not provided. Previous studies found that malpractice liability is a concern to practicing family physicians, specifically for the practice of obstetrics.2 An attempt to mitigate this concern by subsidizing malpractice insurance for family physicians and obstetricians2 showed that physicians who received the subsidy were not more likely to continue providing maternity care. Furthermore, among those planning to quit obstetrical care, subsidized physicians were more likely to cite liability cost as the reason compared with unsubsidized physicians. The authors postulated that unsubsidized physicians were more likely to have insurance paid for by their employer.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview