[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.167.137. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 445
Citations 0
Comment & Response
June 7, 2016

China’s One-Child Policy—In Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
JAMA. 2016;315(21):2350. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2195

In Reply Dr Barrows takes issue with some of the positive aspects of the one-child policy that were outlined in our Viewpoint.

First, we agree that fertility reduction is not ipso facto positive. However, for low- and middle-income countries, the inverse relationship between fertility rate and wealth is well established.1 In China, the reduction in average family size did contribute to poverty reduction. It is well recognized that the policy has contributed to demographic imbalance, and our Viewpoint addressed this problem. Concerns about the increase in the aging population are the reason that the policy has been progressively eased.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×