Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
To the Editor In their Viewpoint, Dr Spatz and colleagues1 advocated a paradigm shift, proposing that the risks, benefits, and alternatives of medical treatments should be based on a reasonable-patient standard, rather than what a responsible body of physicians deems important. Although we agree that patient-centered communication can improve informed consent, we do not believe that a reasonable-patient standard can be defined. We object to the term “standard” because it denotes a fixed, normative reference point. Instead, each patient and medical decision is unique, based on the specific clinical and sociocultural context.
Drolet BC, Brower JP. Informed Consent and the Reasonable-Patient Standard. JAMA. 2016;316(9):993. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.10558