[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 165
Citations 0
JAMA Revisited
June 20, 2017

The Patent Laws and Patent Office Practice

JAMA. 2017;317(23):2455. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.5056

The inequity of our patent laws, or possibly it would be more correct to say, of the interpretation of our patent laws, has been commented on many times in The Journal. The Journal also has had occasion to call attention to patents that have been issued for obviously unscientific and quackish devices and preparations. The cases of the preposterous gas-pipe fake “Oxydonor” and the creatinin mixture for the alleged conferring of immunity against diphtheria, pneumonia, scarlet fever, syphilis, tuberculosis, etc., are cases in point.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×