[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 19, 1944


Author Affiliations

Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, University of Chicago.

JAMA. 1944;124(8):527. doi:10.1001/jama.1944.02850080055024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  It would be desirable to obtain an unassailable degree of protection against human tuberculosis. But how much are we willing to accept, at a time when BCG, good diagnosis, segregation, rest in bed for a year, collapse therapy, adequate vitamin intake and the intriguing but elusive prospect of drug or enzyme therapy are just about all that we have established in this field?The chronic disease itself is intrinsically and indirectly just as great a problem as the actual number of deaths it causes. Most human tuberculosis is not fatal, though it spreads in house-holds and institutions and may cause great misery and economic loss. The recognizable disease is but seldom contracted by a casual infection, in the street car or subway, but usually by several subfatal doses in a dwelling permeated with infection.From these facts it follows that significant protection against even 1 minimum lethal

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview