[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.92.239. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 9, 1932

"CESAREAN UTERINE SUTURES"

JAMA. 1932;99(2):151. doi:10.1001/jama.1932.02740540059030

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —The case report by Dr. Harry S. Fist in The Journal, May 7, page 1635, entitled "Cesarean Uterine Sutures Passed from the Vagina" records an interesting observation but one that bears critical interpretation. Although the patient had a low-grade temperature from 100.6 to 100.8 F. from the second to the seventh day, during which time the lochia were normal, she passed a mass containing the uterine sutures on the eleventh day. This was a necrotic slough. One would like to know how the wound edges were handled before the sutures were placed, whether hemostats or other crushing instruments were used on the uterine incision to control bleeding or to hold the edges in position for suturing.The indictment of the continuous suture made by the author is not warranted by his single case, as many obstetricians have used continuous sutures with success. I have used continuous sutures

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×