[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.48.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 15, 1932

Clinical Interpretation of Laboratory Reports.

JAMA. 1932;99(16):1378. doi:10.1001/jama.1932.02740680074038

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

There has been the complaint from practitioners that those interested in laboratory diagnosis are so engrossed in the mother sciences of chemistry, physiology and pathology that they fail to give adequate attention to the correlation with the clinical approach. There is doubtless much truth on both sides, so much, in fact, as to justify the publication of this book if only to give the critics something to shoot at. As is clearly stated in the preface, "the book is intended for clinicians whose primary interest is the care of their patients and whose knowledge must be ever broadening through things of attested value." Under existing conditions it is almost impossible for even a qualified practitioner of medicine to perform the technical duties of a laboratory worker; hence he must avail himself of a skilled technician or laboratory services. The purpose of this book is to evaluate for the clinician those

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×