[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
November 12, 1932


Author Affiliations

With the Assistance of Margaret E. Cate and Anna W. Herrmann GALVESTON, TEXAS

From the John Sealy Hospital and the Department of Medicine of the University of Texas.

JAMA. 1932;99(20):1647-1652. doi:10.1001/jama.1932.02740720001001

The mechanisms by which diuresis is accomplished by the various therapeutic regimens and the various specific diuretics are still only partially understood. There are sharp differences of opinion not only as to the mode of action, but also as to the point of action of the drugs. Within the last few years much experimental evidence has been advanced, principally by the German investigators1 and their American followers,2 to prove that the effects of the specific diuretics are primarily exerted on the tissues and that the traditional conception of the principal effect of the action of diuretics on the kidney is perhaps in error.

The importance of edema as a clinical therapeutic problem cannot be overstressed. There are considerable clinical data and some experimental evidence that the presence of edema is distinctly disadvantageous, and it seems almost beyond peradventure that the dropsical state adds measurably to the burden of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview