[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 29, 1947

RICKETTSIALPOX—A NEWLY RECOGNIZED RICKETTSIAL DISEASEII. Clinical Observations

Author Affiliations

Bethesda, Md.

From the Bureau of Preventable Diseases, New York City Department of Health, acting director (Dr. Greenberg); epidemiologist (Dr. Pellitteri); the Willard Parker Hospital, deputy medical superintendent (Dr. Klein), and the U. S. Public Health Service, senior assistant surgeon (Dr. Huebner).; From the Bureau of Preventable Diseases, New York City Department of Health, the Willard Parker Hospital, New York, and the Division of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda. Md.

JAMA. 1947;133(13):901-906. doi:10.1001/jama.1947.02880130001001
Abstract

Reports of cases of an unclassified disease were first received by the New York City Department of Health toward the end of June, 1946. Most of the cases came from a single housing development covering three square blocks in one of the five boroughs of the city. As news of the disease spread among physicians, cases located in three other boroughs were called to our attention. This report of the clinical findings is based on the observation of 144 nonfatal cases. Most of the patients were observed during the course of their illness, but some wereseen only after recovery.

The etiology,1 epidemiology2 and method of transmission3 of the disease are considered in other papers in this series. Identical strains of rickettsias have been isolated from the blood of 2 patients1 and from two pools of rodent mites, Allodermanyssus sanguineus (Hirst).3a The name rickettsialpox has been

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×