[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 3, 1954


Author Affiliations

Chase Farm Hospital Enfield, Middlesex, England.

JAMA. 1954;154(14):1199. doi:10.1001/jama.1954.02940480051021

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  While supporting Capt. Julian Love's plea for general use of the metric system, I think he is not strictly correct in one point in his letter (J. A. M. A.154:263 [Jan. 16] 1954). He complains that results of blood chemistry studies are recorded in milligrams per 100 ml., but the leukocyte count is reported in thousands per cubic milliliter rather than microliter. It is still correct, however, to express blood cell counts in this way, because the volume of fluid in the counting chamber is one based essentially on a linear measurement. It is, in fact, strictly a cubic millimeter, or a part thereof. It is not the millionth part of a liter because the liter is now a measure of volume based on an arbitrary standard divorced from the meter. It is true that the idea of the French government was to have measures

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview