[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.139.136. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 26, 1954

EVALUATION OF SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN GASTRIC ULCERS

Author Affiliations

New Orleans

From the Department of Gastroenterology, Browne-McHardy Clinic, Department of Medicine of Tulane University School of Medicine, Charity Hospital, and Touro Infirmary.

JAMA. 1954;155(9):807-810. doi:10.1001/jama.1954.03690270003002
Abstract

The controversial opinions prevalent today regarding management of peptic ulcers are understandable, in view of the fact that no single specific causative factor can be established. Probably the most difficult problem confronting the gastroenterologist is selection of the surgical case of gastric ulcer. This has become increasingly important with the growing advocacy by some that all patients with gastric ulcers should be operated on because (1) malignant lesion is present or will develop in 8 to 10%, (2) "... morbidity due to benign ulcers is terminated promptly, the results of surgical treatment are excellent,..."1 and (3) the operative fatality rate is low.

The problem would indeed be simplified if the foregoing statement could be unreservedly accepted, but excellent studies that have accumulated through the years seriously question the advisability of following a surgical course categorically. The follow-up studies of Smith, Boles, and Jordan,2 Cain,1 Brown,3 and a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×